On Thu, 2005-02-03 at 23:36 +0100, Oliver Zeigermann wrote: > Hi Simon! > > On Thu, 03 Feb 2005 23:57:30 +1300, Simon Kitching <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I look forward to seeing your ideas on stringifying trees of elements. > > Isn't it about time to give Digester2 a place in SVN, so I can either > create patches against it or directly commit to it. What about a > branch in commons proper? Or at least the sandbox?
Done. Do you have commit rights to Digester? If not, I'd be happy to propose a vote... > > actions*. And I generally do debugging by enabling commons-logging > > output rather than write custom debugging actions anyway. Can you think > > of some usecases where this would be useful? > > Hmmm, using SAX it always is a bit tricky to get a good idea how your > XML document that is being parsed *really* looks like. commons-logging > is no good in that case. If you have something that collects the whole > document and regenerates it this can be a very valuable debug > information. Consider the stuff you parse is not in your file system, > but comes from a stream from a remote server it isn't all obvious what > is looks like. Good point. > > > Note also that currently RuleManager can return prebuilt lists when > > match is called; no List object needs instantiating. However if "always > > present" actions have to be inserted into each list, then a new List > > object is required to be created for each match call. > > I understand what you say, but do not understand why a new list would > have to be build with each match call. Why can't you statically addd > the "always present" action into the list? Coul you explain? Possible, I guess. Just a bit tricky... Regards, Simon --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
