On Wed, 16 Feb 2005 08:08:14 -0500, Sean Schofield <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I'm just hesitant to add a new dependency on my own whim. JEXL isn't > > very heavy (132 K) but I think people are keen on keeping Chain light > > too. > > Keeping chain light would be nice. I don't know too much about JEXL > personally although I will be investigating it shortly as an > alternative to Velocity for some template stuff I have. How would you > propose doing it if you didn't use JEXL? > > > Joe
Digester has some limited parameter substitution capabilities that could be applied when the chain configuration is being parsed. Is that enough to satisfy the kinds of things you're thinking of that might want expressions? Craig --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
