The method in question is deprecated. I don't know a lot about how JDiff works, could it be marking it as removed because it is deprecaed?
On 5/6/05, Henri Yandell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Still seeing a Removed method in JDiff. > > ReflectionToStringBuilder.toString(Object, ToStringStyle, boolean, Class). > > Not noticed by Clirr though. > > Clirr didn't notice the MILLI and enum deprecations, but it did notice > ReflectionToStringBuilder deprecations that we don't list in the > release notes. > > Manifest inside the jar looks good. > > Both src zip and src tar.gz build, ant and maven. > > I got the following when untarring, but it's probably not important. I > find tar occasionally spits out bits of info that never seem to hurt > the untarring. > > > tar -zxf commons-lang-2.1-RC5-src.tar.gz > tar: A lone zero block at 6020 > > The only problem I have with release is whether JDiff is right about > an API removal, or if it's confused and Clirr is right. > > Hen > > On 5/4/05, Steven Caswell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > RC5 is available at > http://www.apache.org/~stevencaswell/commons-lang-2.1 > > > > The significant change is the exclusion of the o.c.l.text package and > > associated javadocs, clover results, jdiff, clirr. I also found and > > corrected the maven xdoc problem that caused the extra space between > anchors > > and punctuation. > > > > Hopefully we are ready to go with this one, so here is the vote: > > > > [ ] +1 > > [ ] -1 > > > > -- > > Steven Caswell > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > Take back the web - http://www.mozilla.org > > > > > -- Steven Caswell [EMAIL PROTECTED] Take back the web - http://www.mozilla.org
