DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT <http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32360>. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32360 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|REOPENED |ASSIGNED ------- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-11-01 03:48 ------- I have re-read the part of XPath 2.0 that talks about specifying the default namespace. That solution seems indeed cleaner than what I did with the setDefaultNamespaceIgnored method. Let me redo it with setDefaultNamespace()/getDefaultNamespace(). This won't answer concerns about purity of conformance to XPath 1.0, but bringing in something from XPath 2.0 is better than doing JXPath's own thing. -- Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
