On 3/6/06, Torsten Curdt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > It's not "administatively forcing a separation", it's a natural > > consequence > > of a particular group of components growing up together and > > "graduating" > > with a common purpose. The HttpClient component grew into the > > Jakarta HTTP > > Components subproject, and the Jakarta Web Components subproject > > will likely > > absorb some Commons components as well. What makes it wrong, or even > > different, for a group of Java-language-focussed components to > > "graduate" > > into Jakarta Language Components? To me, it's simply a natural > > evolution of > > the community. > > ...on the other hand it might hard to decide whether some belongs to > that > grouping or not. The definition of "language focussed" is just too > blurry IMO.
For example, does email fit into the language components? What about tagging the components? :-P > > cheers > -- > Torsten > > -- http://www.multitask.com.au/people/dion/ Chuck Norris sleeps with a night light. Not because Chuck Norris is afraid of the dark, but because the dark is afraid of Chuck Norris
