> -----Original Message----- > From: Jörg Schaible [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: jeudi 27 juillet 2006 13:55 > To: Jakarta Commons Users List > Subject: RE: [VFS] Snapshot timestamped version has disappeared from the > m1 snapshot repo! > > Vincent Massol wrote on Thursday, July 27, 2006 12:51 PM: > > >> -----Original Message----- > > > >> From: Mario Ivankovits > >> Sent: jeudi 27 juillet 2006 12:36 > >> To: Jakarta Commons Users List > >> Subject: Re: [VFS] Snapshot timestamped version has disappeared from > >> the m1 snapshot repo! > > [snip] > > >> I dont think that the users want have such fine grained bundles, I > >> perfectly understand that it fits your needs, but having to put e.g. > >> 10 > >> vfs jars to get what you have now might become a pain. > > > > It really depends. You have different types of users. Some > > will only want 2 > > or 3 filesystem providers and they may not like that to have > > to download the > > other 30 providers. > > Well, Carlos proposed once in case of Spring the usage of different POMs. > And there's no reason, why the dependencies of the different filesystems > are not marked as optional.
I know... check the m2 pom that I have submitted :-) http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/VFS-70 Thanks -Vincent ___________________________________________________________________________ Découvrez un nouveau moyen de poser toutes vos questions quelque soit le sujet ! Yahoo! Questions/Réponses pour partager vos connaissances, vos opinions et vos expériences. http://fr.answers.yahoo.com --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
