arne anka wrote: >> ==Pim device== >> > > > imho that's exactly the kind of task openmoko did _not_ ask for. > I would respectfully disagree - Openmoko asked about "Improving user experience", and users are saying they want to experience PIM capabilities.
> there are a lot of posts lately completely ignoring the point of "basics" > and "no eyecandy" I haven't seen anybody ask for pretty-looking PIM applications, people seem to be asking for *reliable* PIM applications. I'd call reliability and robustness "basic". > pim frinst is at it's best part of a middle tier, but rather of a > particular distribution -- This kind of comes into the "Should FSO merge be sped up?" debate, as I believe the framework has PIM stuff built into it. > and it's doable by community! > Agreed, it could be done by the community, but I don't see anyone doing it, and I'm not smart enough, nor do I have the time at the moment. > there are several task which require knowledge of the hardware and access > to nda'ed docs, which in turn means they are best or exclusively solved by > openmoko's limited forces. > Agreed. _______________________________________________ Openmoko community mailing list community@lists.openmoko.org http://lists.openmoko.org/mailman/listinfo/community