On 2 Nov 2005, at 21:50, Anthony Moss wrote:
I would like to dispute the Mac Classic's inclusion in the list of The Ten Worst Macs Ever, and state that if the Mac Plus had not been kept on life support for the best part of five years, the cheap machine intended to bring Mac computing to the masses would have had a much better pedigree, and much better design.
Well, if you're taking a vote, I'd keep it in the list! It was six years after the first Mac, yet exactly the same processor, running at exactly the same speed. Its only merit was price. Of great significance in marketing terms, but of zero significance in technological terms.
Stuart -- Compact Macs is sponsored by <http://lowendmac.com/>. Support Low End Mac <http://lowendmac.com/lists/support.html> Compact Macs list info: <http://lowendmac.com/lists/compact.shtml> --> AOL users, remove "mailto:"; Send list messages to: <mailto:[email protected]> To unsubscribe, email: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> For digest mode, email: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subscription questions: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Archive:<http://www.mail-archive.com/compact.macs%40mail.maclaunch.com/> --------------------------------------------------------------- iPod Accessories for Less at 1-800-iPOD.COM Fast Delivery, Low Price, Good Deal www.1800ipod.com ---------------------------------------------------------------
