> I am OK with all of this, with partial reservations on [5]. My > reservations are not based on the substance of [5], but on the > logistics of [5]. I am operating under the assumption that > defining "core" Solaris is probably a task to be shared with Sun > Microsystems, Inc., whereas defining "core" OpenSolaris would be a > task to be delegated to the Community, or a Community-delegated > Working Group, or any other such Community-based entity.
Can we agreed that the current consumer of the work done through OpenSolaris.org is Sun Microsystems? (Through Solaris, and Sun's downstream customers) The weekly builds are after all called Solaris Express, not OpenSolaris express. That said, a Sun employee is by fact a representative of Sun, as their involvement in OpenSolaris is paid for by Sun. I don't think there is a need to make a distinction between Solaris and OpenSolaris at this time. > But, maybe things have recently changed dramatically and I am simply > unaware of these changes. Seems to me changes are afoot. > Either way, I will not hold the entire draft hostage to these > reservations, so it's a conditional "Yes" from me, pending some > future refinements and adjustments. Great. Anyone else?
