On Tue, 2007-06-19 at 18:16 -0700, steve uurtamo wrote: > sorry, i should have said that i think that it's least complicated > with sudden death. unless you mean to treat it internally as > if it's sudden death, but to use fisher time to make up for lag/delay.
I'm talking about from the humans point of view. For a computer it's not quite as simple as sudden death. In sudden death you can always take a percentage of the remaining time. With Fischer I would probably just take the increment plus a percentage of the remaining time or perhaps just a percentage of the remaining time (but a fairly heavy percentage.) - Don _______________________________________________ computer-go mailing list computer-go@computer-go.org http://www.computer-go.org/mailman/listinfo/computer-go/
