You are right. I don't do progressive widening. -Hideki
Gian-Carlo Pascutto: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: >> I also implemented RAVE in Mango. There was a few points of improvements >> (around 60 Elo points with gnugo as reference), but as much as in the >> paper of Gelly and Silver :( (around 250 Elo points if I remember well) >> >> It might be that the effect of RAVE depends a lot on the simulation >> strategy. Indeed, sometimes my RAVE was playing very good moves but also >> very bad ones. > >I don't think the simulation strategy is the key. > >I suspect the improvement is largest when you don't do progressive widening. > >Nevertheless it would be quite interesting to see the implementation >details of ggmc's RAVE. RAVE performance is quite dependent on exact >implementation and parameters. -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Kato) _______________________________________________ computer-go mailing list computer-go@computer-go.org http://www.computer-go.org/mailman/listinfo/computer-go/
