> > Plans, evaluation functions, ect failed for over 20 years to produce true > (amateur) dan level programs. >
True. However, the failure of a few efforts to make progress in a direction does not imply that the direction is a dead end. I will be addressing this issue in a future video in the series. Also, you cannot give reasons for moves "after the fact" if reason wasn't > used to obtain the selected move in the first place. > Exactly so. As stated in "Life and Death", the principal research objective of HALy is for it to be able to formulate and explain its reasons. I feel that the domain of Go is a useful microworld for experimenting with perception and reasoning representations. Current research in volition and conscious choice > indicates that conscious choice is actually an after the fact explanation > of decisions based on unconscious processes. > Yes indeed. This suggests that science is just beginning to discover that philosophical intuitions about consciousness based on no experimentation at all are mere speculations. I think you forgot to suggest which pharmaceuticals, legal or otherwise, to > be using while watching this. Without said pharmacological assistance, that > video doesn't make a bit of sense to me. > I am unaware of any chemicals that could viably substitute for doing a bit of homework. I would be happy to explain any specific issues outside the domain of computer go that you do not understand if you raise them in a YouTube comment. I am aware that the video touches on several myths whose historical origins and current implications are not common knowledge. -- http://sites.google.com/site/djhbrown2/home https://www.youtube.com/user/djhbrown
_______________________________________________ Computer-go mailing list Computer-go@computer-go.org http://computer-go.org/mailman/listinfo/computer-go
