Probably you've got this question multiple times, but I'd still like to ask.
Why not implement your ideas as a computer program? In my opinion programming languages are much better in expressing logical, computational ideas than natural languages. You can also "see" how well your ideas work. 2015. 9. 4. 오후 11:43에 "Robert Jasiek" <jas...@snafu.de>님이 작성: > On 04.09.2015 15:55, Stefan Kaitschick wrote: > >> Robert, David Fotland has paid his dues on "truly intelligent" go >> programs. >> Maybe more than anybody else. >> I find your critique a little painful. Don't blame David, that the >> "stupid" >> monte carlo works so much better. >> > > So far I have not criticised but asked questions. I am a great fan of the > expert system approach because a) I have studied go knowledge a lot and > see, in principle, light at the end of the tunnel, b) I think that "MC + > expert system" or "only expert system" can be better than MC if the expert > system is well designed, c) an expert system can, in principle, provide > more meaningful insight for us human duffers than an MC because the expert > system can express itself in terms of reasoning. (Disclaimer: There is a > good chance that I will criticise anybody presenting his definitions for > use in an expert system. But who does not dare to be criticised does not > learn!) > > -- > robert jasiek > _______________________________________________ > Computer-go mailing list > Computer-go@computer-go.org > http://computer-go.org/mailman/listinfo/computer-go
_______________________________________________ Computer-go mailing list Computer-go@computer-go.org http://computer-go.org/mailman/listinfo/computer-go
