Hi Petri, "Petri Pitkanen" <petri.t.pitka...@gmail.com> > ... I do doubt if strong go programs give too much for analysis. > Even if they are 1p and can show you a better move it is not worth > much for a human when there is no reasoning available how to zoom > into that move.
that is just my point. The program needs some interface features to become really helpful as a tool for analysis. In chess, such features were introduced (in the early 1990's; mainly by ChessBase) and became common soon. > Even in chess no-one really gains form computer analysis. Very wrong. From the mid 1990's most strong correspondence chess players use computer help intensively; and a few years later the same started in opening preparation for over-the-table grandmasters. Example: In 2002 Tonu Oim (Estonia) got his second World Champion Title with the help of friends from Finland [sic!] and their chess programs. Ingo. _______________________________________________ Computer-go mailing list Computer-go@computer-go.org http://computer-go.org/mailman/listinfo/computer-go
