I'm not surprised that MS is backing down; it would have been an easy prediction that they would offer a fix toot sweet. You'd think, though, they'd get tired of all the ice cream cone to the forehead events.
We weren't affected by it, but I could see it coming up eventually as people with SP3 tried to open archival files. > -----Original Message----- > MS is backpedalling on this... > > www.eweek.com/article2/0,1895,2243957,00.asp > > I'm particularly amused by the 3rd paragraph: "We blamed the other > guys, > but the problem was actually in our lousy code." Typical MS. ************************************************************************ * ==> QUICK LIST-COMMAND REFERENCE - Put the following commands in <== * ==> the body of an email & send 'em to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <== * Join the list: SUBSCRIBE COMPUTERGUYS-L Your Name * Too much mail? Try Daily Digests command: SET COMPUTERGUYS-L DIGEST * Tired of the List? Unsubscribe command: SIGNOFF COMPUTERGUYS-L * New address? From OLD address send: CHANGE COMPUTERGUYS-L YourNewAddress * Need more help? Send mail to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ************************************************************************ * List archive from 1/1/2000 is on the MARC http://marc.info/?l=computerguys-l * List archive at www.mail-archive.com/computerguys-l@listserv.aol.com/ * RSS at www.mail-archive.com/computerguys-l@listserv.aol.com/maillist.xml * Messages bearing the header "X-No-Archive: yes" will not be archived ************************************************************************
