I was just responding to the results of the survey without figuring in the overhead. A 3.5 multiplier is a bit high, unless you maintain your own offices and staff, but not unreasonable.
>If this multiplier is basically accurate, this would translate into needing >to charge about $70/hr to make the equivalent of $40 K. This would seem to >suggest that getting something like $30 or $35/hr would hardly be viable; be >better off working at a regular job. > >Does anyone think this analysis (the teacher's, not mine) is off? ************************************************************************ * ==> QUICK LIST-COMMAND REFERENCE - Put the following commands in <== * ==> the body of an email & send 'em to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <== * Join the list: SUBSCRIBE COMPUTERGUYS-L Your Name * Too much mail? Try Daily Digests command: SET COMPUTERGUYS-L DIGEST * Tired of the List? Unsubscribe command: SIGNOFF COMPUTERGUYS-L * New address? From OLD address send: CHANGE COMPUTERGUYS-L YourNewAddress * Need more help? Send mail to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ************************************************************************ * List archive from 1/1/2000 is on the MARC http://marc.info/?l=computerguys-l * List archive at www.mail-archive.com/computerguys-l@listserv.aol.com/ * RSS at www.mail-archive.com/computerguys-l@listserv.aol.com/maillist.xml * Messages bearing the header "X-No-Archive: yes" will not be archived ************************************************************************
