That was kind of my point. Not really happy about the thought of
paying for a house that burned to the ground 5 years earlier. But the
option of not buying insurance should be there. That's tort reform for
you. Hard to sue an insurance company if you never paid for it in the
first place. This of course assumes your insurance company is refusing
to pay your claim.
Jeff Miles
jmile...@charter.net
Join my Mafia
http://apps.facebook.com/inthemafia/status_invite.php?from=550968726
On Sep 10, 2009, at 10:09 PM, t.piwowar wrote:
On Sep 8, 2009, at 6:23 AM, Jeff Miles wrote:
As for letting the free market work for insurance companies, I'm
all for that. Let's stop requiring insurance for damn near
everything. Let's make it an option. Do you want to buy a house?
You don't have to buy fire insurance. You want to drive a car? You
don't have to have whatever insurance. You want to live a few years
more? You don't have to buy health insurance. But the option could
be there if you do.
Fine, but if you do opt out of medical insurance and you don't have
proof of cash up front and you do have an accident the ambulance
will refuse to transport you. We just let you bleed to death on the
side of the road. You fine with that?
*************************************************************************
** List info, subscription management, list rules, archives,
privacy **
** policy, calmness, a member map, and more at http://
www.cguys.org/ **
*************************************************************************
*************************************************************************
** List info, subscription management, list rules, archives, privacy **
** policy, calmness, a member map, and more at http://www.cguys.org/ **
*************************************************************************
