I'm not sure where to even start if you have never head of Apple's legendary control issues. It's been talked about here, on the web, books, television...magazines You also keep bringing up Psystar which has nothing to do with what I'm talking about. Yes, Apple's plan has always been to mate software/hardware for a good user experience...still nothing to do with what I was talking about. I'm not sure why you are pretending to be obtuse concerning what I was talking about, that's fine, just seems like a waste of time for both of us for you to do this.
On Tue, Nov 3, 2009 at 4:19 AM, Snyder, Mark - IdM (IS) <mark.sny...@ngc.com > wrote: > Probably because you didn't write clearly. You just now brought up this > "control freak perception" issue; where did you get that from? > > Apple is planning a large jump in its research. Some of that will go > for OS X. Why would they make it easy for others to sell OS X the way > Psyster is (during the law suit)? > > Apple's business plan has always been to mate hardware and software to > provide the best user experience. You may disagree with that by > choosing another product, but complaining about it sounds like > whimpering to me. > > Thank you, > > Mark Snyder > -----Original Message----- > > You missed what I said. I never stated I wanted Apple to invest money > making their product work on atom CPUs. They already do, so Apple is > going > back to write code to break it. With the massive profits, why not go a > little down the pr road and just let those extremely few do it and try > to > negate the control freak perception Apple has with the public? > > On Nov 3, 2009 3:42 AM, "Snyder, Mark - IdM (IS)" <mark.sny...@ngc.com> > wrote: > > Apple is preventing them from taking advantage of Apple's investments in > iTunes and in Mac OS X by not making these investments work with > non-Apple products; phones and other products competing with Apple. The > reason Apple spends money to develop and market them is to provide > advantages to Apple products. For example, Apple has no products using > Atom processors and no plans to use them, so why would they make Mac OS > X work on them? How could this not be clear? > > Thank you, Mark Snyder -----Original Message----- How is MSI making > money > off apple? How is palm... > > > ************************************************************************ > * > ** List info, subscription management, list rules, archives, privacy > ** > ** policy, calmness, a member map, and more at http://www.cguys.org/ > ** > ************************************************************************ > * > > > ************************************************************************* > ** List info, subscription management, list rules, archives, privacy ** > ** policy, calmness, a member map, and more at http://www.cguys.org/ ** > ************************************************************************* > ************************************************************************* ** List info, subscription management, list rules, archives, privacy ** ** policy, calmness, a member map, and more at http://www.cguys.org/ ** *************************************************************************
