Sounds lIke a case could be made not to implement any expansion of
internet access, and even to curtail, limit or eliminate a lot of what
already exists. I'd have to think that were any evidence to come to
light that a cyber attack was occurring, that internet access would be
shut down for all but "necessary" systems.
Sound's like today's conservative mantra: don't fix healthcare, dismantle it.
So I suppose a true conservative would eschew TCP/IP for good old reliable
smoke signals.
Why shut it down? Ramping up is better. Can you really shut down
everything without something drastic and stupid like an EMP? And that
wouldn't shut down those who are secure and off grid. There are too many
short cuts and back doors. Expand everything. Are you likely to be attacked?
Who would attack and how? What software and hardware would be shut down
by a cyber attack anyway?
*************************************************************************
** List info, subscription management, list rules, archives, privacy **
** policy, calmness, a member map, and more at http://www.cguys.org/ **
*************************************************************************