I didn't even know MS was working on a pad like device...I know HP has the slate which is a finished product and due soon. There are a lot of devices coming out that are pad like devices, some more expensive than others. I seriously doubt when MS saw the iphone they said to themselves 'holy cow we need to make a multitouch device the size of a small car to fight them!'
No one said the ipad was imaginary, making up stuff never helps your case..and have you seen the ipad? It is a big ipod touch. Aside from size, what is the difference? On Tue, Mar 9, 2010 at 7:35 AM, tjpa <t...@tjpa.com> wrote: > On Mar 9, 2010, at 7:47 AM, John Duncan Yoyo wrote: > >> The possible windows pad is an advertising feint. Just like M$ announced >> the Surface when Apple's iPhone Buzz sucked all the oxygen out of the >> market >> before it's release the pad is a peice of advertising vaporware intended >> to >> keep the M$ name in circulation. >> > > Exactly. We are a few weeks away from being able to walk into an Apple > Store to buy an iPad. M$ is still doodling and has not even settled on the > processor necessary to run it. That's a big difference. > > Apple also has a track record of big successes with this type of product. > M$ has a record of failure and vaporware. > > It is interesting how the WFBs will say in the same breath that the iPad is > nothing more than a big iTouch and then claim that it is an imaginary > product. > > > > ************************************************************************* > ** List info, subscription management, list rules, archives, privacy ** > ** policy, calmness, a member map, and more at http://www.cguys.org/ ** > ************************************************************************* > ************************************************************************* ** List info, subscription management, list rules, archives, privacy ** ** policy, calmness, a member map, and more at http://www.cguys.org/ ** *************************************************************************