Douglas E. Warner wrote: > Okay, thanks for the examples. > > AFAICT, the rules.d folder is just so packages can ship their own scripts, not > to enable/disable them through some other mechanism. If you don't mind, I'd > prefer that we just stick the udev rule in /etc/udev/rules.d and forget about > the symlink. If you'd like to keep it this way I can easily fix it in Fedora > land in the package, no problem.
I don't feel strongly, so I changed your patch to modify this as well. It now does it this way. > Either way, let me know when the patch is merged and I'll try to build a new > libconcord package to make sure everything is working as-intended. Submitted. -- Phil Dibowitz p...@ipom.com Open Source software and tech docs Insanity Palace of Metallica http://www.phildev.net/ http://www.ipom.com/ "Never write it in C if you can do it in 'awk'; Never do it in 'awk' if 'sed' can handle it; Never use 'sed' when 'tr' can do the job; Never invoke 'tr' when 'cat' is sufficient; Avoid using 'cat' whenever possible" -- Taylor's Laws of Programming
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Open Source Business Conference (OSBC), March 24-25, 2009, San Francisco, CA -OSBC tackles the biggest issue in open source: Open Sourcing the Enterprise -Strategies to boost innovation and cut costs with open source participation -Receive a $600 discount off the registration fee with the source code: SFAD http://p.sf.net/sfu/XcvMzF8H
_______________________________________________ concordance-devel mailing list concordance-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/concordance-devel
