Phil Dibowitz wrote: > Douglas E. Warner wrote: >> Okay, thanks for the examples. >> >> AFAICT, the rules.d folder is just so packages can ship their own scripts, >> not >> to enable/disable them through some other mechanism. If you don't mind, I'd >> prefer that we just stick the udev rule in /etc/udev/rules.d and forget about >> the symlink. If you'd like to keep it this way I can easily fix it in Fedora >> land in the package, no problem. > > I don't feel strongly, so I changed your patch to modify this as well. It > now does it this way. > >> Either way, let me know when the patch is merged and I'll try to build a new >> libconcord package to make sure everything is working as-intended. > > Submitted.
Looks good; packages built without any patching this morning straight from CVS. -Doug
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Open Source Business Conference (OSBC), March 24-25, 2009, San Francisco, CA -OSBC tackles the biggest issue in open source: Open Sourcing the Enterprise -Strategies to boost innovation and cut costs with open source participation -Receive a $600 discount off the registration fee with the source code: SFAD http://p.sf.net/sfu/XcvMzF8H
_______________________________________________ concordance-devel mailing list concordance-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/concordance-devel
