Hi Pekka,

On Wed, Aug 18, 2010 at 07:25:08PM +0300, Pekka Pessi wrote:
> Hi Samuel,
> 
> 2010/8/18 Samuel Ortiz <[email protected]>:
> >> Create modem only after Modem.GetProperties succeeds, thus avoiding races
> >> with Modem.PropertyChanged signal.
> > So I've commented on this one and my concernas about the Powered property 
> > not
> > being handled anymore, except when creating the modem.
> 
> I must have missed that, good thing you catched it.
> 
> The current code tries to set Modem.Powered after there is a change in
> ModemManager.Modems list. The current behavior and my patch differ
> only if there are multiple modems in the device. In my patch the
> Modem.Powered is tried only once.  If we need retries on
> Modem.Powered, I think it is much better to handle explicitly than as
> a side effect of plugging in another modem.
No, I wasn't talking about retries, but rather about what happens when a
second modem gets plugged in. But I realize that this would be handled
correctly from your code. Nevermind.



> > I have another comment:
> >
> >> +     new_modem = add_modem(path);
> >> +     if (new_modem == NULL)
> >> +             goto done;
> > I don't like the fact that add_modem returns NULL when failing but also when
> > the modem already exists. I would prefer to keep the semantics as they are
> > right now, and handle the below code from add_modem(). So add_modem()
> > prototype would change but will always return the right modem when not 
> > failing
> > and NULL otherwise.
> 
> Is there a need for another code path for creating modems? 
No, but since you're only calling add_modem() once now, you could add the
following code:

+       if (!powered)
+               modem_change_powered(path, TRUE);
+
+       if (has_gprs)
+               get_imsi(path);
+

to it, and keep the correct semantics, i.e. return NULL from add_modem() only
when it failed. If the modem is already there, you just return it.

Cheers,
Samuel.



> If so, I'm
> happy to duplicate the hash table lookup in modem_properties_reply().
> 
> -- 
> Pekka.Pessi mail at nokia.com
> _______________________________________________
> connman mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://lists.connman.net/listinfo/connman

-- 
Intel Open Source Technology Centre
http://oss.intel.com/
_______________________________________________
connman mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.connman.net/listinfo/connman

Reply via email to