I know 2 elderly dancers in our community who obviously need help while dancing. Almost everyone knows that, and helps them. Sometimes they skip moves, shorten and slow a swing, "swing" without turning, exit the dance at the end of the line, or make whatever accomodations are needed to help them. I've never heard anyone complain about them, and I regularly see them sitting out talking with other dancers, myself included. It's another example of what I love about our community.
On another part of that spectrum are the middle-age men who only dance with young women, almost always new dancers who don't know how to say no. It's been a while since I've seen it, but we used to get complaints about stalking on the dance floor and in the parking lot. We started writing down those complaints, dating them, and confronting the offender about it. We had to "uninvite" a couple guys. Word got around, and we've not seen that behavior in the 18 months since we reopened our dance. It really helps that everyone knows dancers can come to the organizers with a problem and we will swiftly deal with it. Then there are the children. We've had to ask people not to pick up the small dancers and swing them off their feet. A gentle, occasional reminder is helpful. -Amy On Tue, Mar 12, 2024, 11:38 AM Richard Fischer via Contra Callers < contracallers@lists.sharedweight.net> wrote: > Since "ageism" has been mentioned, I'd like to share an idea I've often > had. I wonder if anyone thinks it's a good idea, or if it's already done at > any contra dances. What if one dance per evening, perhaps in the first > half, were done at a slightly slower tempo, and featured choreography that > allowed for some standing around. Perhaps a dance like Chorus Jig, where > some folks could choose to join at the end. Or a more recent dance that > still features down time, for example one where the 1's and 2's have > separate swings. I think that might be helpful to some elderly dancers, if > you have them, and to others who may not have a lot of stamina, or who get > dizzy easily, etc. It might be a way to make contra dancing even more > welcoming than it already is. > > Richard > in Arlington, MA > > On Mar 12, 2024, at 1:36 PM, Julian Blechner via Contra Callers < > contracallers@lists.sharedweight.net> wrote: > > I'm nodding with a lot of comments from the last couple days. Louise > articulated some base concepts clearly, which a lot of y'all expanded on. > > There are some contradictory ideas about gender and sexuality with dance, > and I think we in general tend to shy away from delving too deeply in > public discussion. I've been accused of "shaming" people for asking why a > man may prefer dancing with women. The thing is, I've also said what I > think nearly everyone - including most/all of the strongest advocates for > genderfree contra - has said: its OK to have preferences for partners. I > think it is sometimes hard to presume these discussions are done assuming > the benefit of good intent, given how much gender and sexuality is an > enormous political and civil rights topic in the US and most Western > nations. But, I presume this good intent, and I think nearly everyone here > does, too, so, I'm taking another stab at this topic. > > Here's some ideas I've been chewing over in an attempt to dig into this > more deeply: > - dance is often a courtship ritual > - despite this, inter-gender set dancing has a long tradition in Western > dance, and partnering with someone hasn't really ever been a "oh, I am > attracted to them". To use the overused example of Jane Austen novels, even > then it's clear family dance together, friends dance together, and > strangers dance together just to have any partner. > - children are at our dances. So if a person is choosing partners based on > heterosexual tradition, why, um: EW > > And thus is where the conversation often stops. But to break it down more: > > - So, when someone says they prefer to dance in non-genderfree dances, > with a partner of a different binary-presenting gender person, in trad > roles, there's 2 possible, non-exclusive reasons: > 1. That their choice is about courtship, but "make exceptions" for people > you're not attracted to. Which, I guess is fine in and of itself, but I > think people with this preference often may not consider _just how many > exceptions_ there are. > 2. Their choice is more about embracing traditional gender roles. I'll get > back to this. > > So, in the case of #1, the problem isn't just about "what do we do with > the fact that about 5% of people aren't straight". (And realize the number > being 3 or 4 times as high among surveyed youth, with numbers lower in > areas where anti-lgbtq law and sentiment pervades). > > The problem is also about fat phobia. And bias against people who aren't > "conventionally attractive". And ageism. And disability phobia. Then > there's the even worse case of when a person both claims attraction is > their main factor for partner preference ... and also has a preference for > much younger dancers. :| > > Pushing back on the idea of "partner preference because of sexual > preference" is about all these issues - fatphobia, ageism, disability > phobia, beauty-bias, etc. Now, maybe these things aren't a priority to > everyone, but, I'm going to assume that the overwhelming majority of people > on Shared Weight are interested in most, if not all of them. And, > inevitably, remember - youth, beauty, and able-bodiedness all will fade for > everyone. > > In reality, I think partner and role preference for trad-gender-partnering > actually has to do more with gender norms. So insofar as sexual-attraction > for partner preference, I think pushing back, openly, against this, can > benefit dance communities in many ways. And, ultimately if that's not > actually the main reason, then it isn't really harming anyone if we present > it and deal with it with compassion and patience for those having > difficulty with the change. It's not like people aren't going to flirt and > meet sexual partners anyway; we simply don't need to establish dance as a > courtship-by-default space. > > Which leads to look at the other reason, #2: wanting trad gender > partnering because you just like trad gender roles. > > In and of itself, that's fine. If you like ways of having your binary > gender reinforced, there's nothing wrong with that. And while I'm not > transgender, my friends who are and have shifted/come out as a different > binary gender identity deserve to have their gender affirmed, too. While > me, personally, I don't need reinforcement about being man (which is its > own privilege), I respect people's desire for their gender to be respected > and celebrated. > > So, what does that mean for dancing? > - Ultimately, as long as people are finding partners and having fun and > people are respectful of anyone they meet in line, great! > - As noted, splitting up people because of gender is disrespectful on > several levels. > - That complaining about "ah, so many neighbors are my same gender" is > setting one's own preference above everyone else's. In short: it's selfish. > - If someone refuses to dance with someone of the same gender (or > nonbinary/agender folks who "don't look like the opposite gender") then > that's selfish. It's not _as_ selfish as the last item, and, generally, if > this is what they choose, I don't see the positive outcomes from pushing it. > > So, if someone wants to just dance trad gender preference in partners, > that's fine to me. > > There is, though, the big Catch 22: > > If someone believes gendered roles "are just role names", while > simultaneously have a strong/sole preference trad-gender-partnering, this > is self-contradictory. That person is trying to have it both ways. > > And so, I leave with the thought: this last bit I see as a core sticking > point to more equality and inclusion at dances. > > How do we address this? > > Can we start looking at this more openly in a way that is compassionate > buy also more direct that we have been? > > In dance, > Julian Blechner > He/Him > Western Mass > > On Tue, Mar 12, 2024, 12:24 PM Tanya Merchant via Contra Callers < > contracallers@lists.sharedweight.net> wrote: > >> I’m bumping this for folks who want to talk about gender preference in >> dance partners. >> >> And while I understand the valid social and historical context that would >> make inactive roles a good thing for the social part of social dancing, >> like Jeff, I’m also really glad we don’t do that much anymore. >> >> >> Tanya H. Merchant >> >> >> On Tue, Mar 12, 2024 at 06:01 Jeff Kaufman via Contra Callers < >> contracallers@lists.sharedweight.net> wrote: >> >>> "The whole point of moving away from Proper to First Couples Improper >>> or Becket was that you then had people of the opposite gender on both >>> sides of you in your minor set, so that all Neighbour and Partner >>> interactions were with the opposite gender" >>> >>> That's one advantage for some people, but another advantage of >>> Improper and Becket is that they make it much easier to have >>> equal-turn dances, where everyone is 'active' simultaneously. No more >>> waiting fifteen times through for a chance to be a "one" and then only >>> getting to dance it twice before the music stops. >>> >>> Jeff >>> >>> On Tue, Mar 12, 2024 at 8:54 AM Katherine Kitching via Contra Callers >>> <contracallers@lists.sharedweight.net> wrote: >>> > >>> > On the topic of a comfortable swing that maintains the ballroom hold, >>> i'll repeat the suggestion I offered a few months back. >>> > >>> > As part of our transition to promoting a culture of "we encourage >>> everyone to dance with everyone else, regardless of gender, age, level of >>> experience or any other factor" - and also as a reaction to covid, we've >>> started designating the standard neighbour swing (and default partner >>> swing, if you don't know your partner and don't want to experiment), as a >>> "modified ballroom hold" - which we call the "elbow hold". >>> > >>> > This swing gives a little more space between the couple, without in >>> any way compromising the effectiveness of the swing in my opinion. (Though >>> I am sure there will be some other opinions out there ;). ) >>> > >>> > Ballroom hands same as always. >>> > >>> > Other hand cupped around the back of the upper arm of your partner, >>> just above the elbow. >>> > >>> > Taller person's arm goes above the shorter persons arm. >>> > >>> > The more I practice this hold, the more I like it. >>> > I find it makes me more comfortable with everyone (and in fact, as a >>> cisgender woman I find it makes the most difference to me when dancing with >>> men, I have found I like having a bit of extra space between me and any man >>> who is not my spouse :) ) >>> > >>> > I offer this in the spirit of "something my group finds effective". >>> > >>> > >>> > KK >>> > >>> > Mar 12, 2024 7:18:46 AM John Sweeney via Contra Callers < >>> contracallers@lists.sharedweight.net>: >>> > >>> > Hi all, >>> > >>> > I once called Chris Page’s dance where the dancers >>> scatter individually and find someone with whom to do a Gypsy Meltdown >>> (Gypsy & Swing). Many of the ladies got together leaving two men alone in >>> the middle of the dance-floor. There was absolutely no way that those two >>> men were going to Swing each other in a Ballroom Hold. >>> > >>> > There was an article in the EFDSS magazine not so long >>> ago about this very challenge. The author was concerned that by going >>> gender-free they would lose many good male dancers who weren’t comfortable >>> with the situation. >>> > >>> > Someone in these threads said that, if you prefer >>> dancing with ladies, then there is nothing preventing you from only asking >>> ladies for a dance. But what happens when you get in the set and find that >>> every Neighbour that you meet is a man! >>> > >>> > I and my wife dance many styles, West Coast Swing, Blues, Ceroc, >>> Modern Jive, Tango, Salsa, etc. 99% of the time it is one man with one >>> lady (OK, I specialise in dancing with two ladies at once, but that is >>> another matter!). Occasionally there will be same-sex pairings, and nobody >>> thinks anything of it. But it is not being forced on them in the way that >>> contra dancing is forcing same-sex pairings as you meet and interact with >>> all your Neighbours. >>> > >>> > The whole point of moving away from Proper to First Couples Improper >>> or Becket was that you then had people of the opposite gender on both sides >>> of you in your minor set, so that all Neighbour and Partner interactions >>> were with the opposite gender! >>> > >>> > I think part of the challenge is the very close Ballroom-Hold Swing >>> which many men find too intimate with another man. Of course there are >>> lots of symmetrical holds that don’t have the same challenge – you are >>> further apart. They don’t have the “Pointy Hand” to help you remember >>> which side to finish on. I often use these myself in contra dances when I >>> have a good partner, doing a different Swing each time through the dance, >>> but I know which side to finish the Swing on. I suspect the Ballroom-Hold >>> Swing is too embedded in Contra Dance culture to change now, though, of >>> course, it was not always so. >>> > >>> > The communities that I call for all want men dancing with ladies. I >>> use geographic and positional calling where it helps. I start most >>> sessions by saying, “Find a partner, traditionally one man and one lady, >>> but anyone can dance with anyone.” 99% of the time they will dance with >>> the opposite gender. >>> > >>> > Personally I have a real problem with Larks & Robins since I use Men & >>> Ladies in my calling. For me the L in Lark makes me think of Ladies, not >>> Left. It really hurts my brain! >>> > >>> > I am all for anyone dancing with anyone. I dance the Lady’s role and >>> will Swing anyone. I love Chaos Lines! (And please don’t assume that you >>> know anything about my sexuality!) >>> > >>> > I feel that it is very sad that the traditional and historic concepts >>> are being lost. Our culture has always been very inclusive, with everyone >>> welcome and anyone dancing with anyone they want. I am not at all convinced >>> that any benefits outweigh the losses. >>> > >>> > Happy dancing, >>> > >>> > John >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> > John Sweeney, Dancer, England j...@modernjive.com 01233 625 362 & >>> 07802 940 574 >>> > >>> > http://www.contrafusion.co.uk for Dancing in Kent >>> > >>> > _______________________________________________ >>> > Contra Callers mailing list -- contracallers@lists.sharedweight.net >>> > To unsubscribe send an email to >>> contracallers-le...@lists.sharedweight.net >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Contra Callers mailing list -- contracallers@lists.sharedweight.net >>> To unsubscribe send an email to >>> contracallers-le...@lists.sharedweight.net >>> >> _______________________________________________ >> Contra Callers mailing list -- contracallers@lists.sharedweight.net >> To unsubscribe send an email to >> contracallers-le...@lists.sharedweight.net >> > _______________________________________________ > Contra Callers mailing list -- contracallers@lists.sharedweight.net > To unsubscribe send an email to contracallers-le...@lists.sharedweight.net > > > _______________________________________________ > Contra Callers mailing list -- contracallers@lists.sharedweight.net > To unsubscribe send an email to contracallers-le...@lists.sharedweight.net >
_______________________________________________ Contra Callers mailing list -- contracallers@lists.sharedweight.net To unsubscribe send an email to contracallers-le...@lists.sharedweight.net
