But operational needs to be transferred to the followers in the cluster. It uses a different mechanism?
From: Tom Pantelis [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Wednesday, January 11, 2017 1:06 AM To: Sela, Guy <[email protected]> Cc: Robert Varga <[email protected]>; [email protected]; odl netvirt dev <[email protected]> Subject: Re: [controller-dev] [mdsal-dev] Netvirt Scale tests: OutOfMemory from datastore operational won't snapshot if not persisted or replicated. Can you open a bug for tracking? On Tue, Jan 10, 2017 at 4:12 PM, Sela, Guy <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: Do the snapshot happen only to the configuration data store or to the operational as well? -----Original Message----- From: Robert Varga [mailto:[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>] Sent: Tuesday, January 10, 2017 10:21 PM To: Tom Pantelis <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>; Sela, Guy <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> Cc: [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>; odl netvirt dev <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> Subject: Re: [controller-dev] [mdsal-dev] Netvirt Scale tests: OutOfMemory from datastore On 01/10/2017 08:16 PM, Tom Pantelis wrote: > Since the length field of an array is an int, it's constrained to > Integer.MAX_VALUE (~2G). To handle snapshots larger than 2G we'll have > to chuck it into multiple byte[]. That could get funky on the reassembly side of things. If we go that route, we may as well switch to something more friendly, like java.nio.ByteBuffer(), too. Guy, just out of curiosity: how much duplication is in your data set? Regards, Robert
_______________________________________________ controller-dev mailing list [email protected] https://lists.opendaylight.org/mailman/listinfo/controller-dev
