+ Daniel and Marcus

Jumping in here with some questions..
Is the bottom line here that the whole config DS size cannot exceed 2GB or did 
I get something wrong?
Is it possible we never encountered such a scenario in the S3P performance 
tests done in Beryllium/Boron [1], or did something change in the behavior?

It seems that this limitation is extremely problematic for scale, and should be 
easily recreated by doing NetVirt scale tests (loading ~200 computes and 
creating a VM on each, or configuring a TZ for all of them manually).

I see 1800 OVSDB nodes were installed in [1], but not sure if any flows were 
configured on the OpenFlow side which might cause the DS to scale..
We also need to monitor what part of the DS is taking so much space - we might 
have redundant data being stored catching up space, but in any case projects 
would hit 2GB at some point.

[1] 
https://www.opendaylight.org/sites/www.opendaylight.org/files/odl_performancetechnicalreport_1-1_052716.pdf
--alon

From: [email protected] 
[mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Sela, Guy
Sent: Wednesday, 11 January 2017 11:23
To: Tom Pantelis <[email protected]>
Cc: odl netvirt dev <[email protected]>; 
[email protected]; Robert Varga <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: [netvirt-dev] [controller-dev] [mdsal-dev] Netvirt Scale tests: 
OutOfMemory from datastore

Opened a bug:
https://bugs.opendaylight.org/show_bug.cgi?id=7521


From: Tom Pantelis [mailto:[email protected]]
Sent: Wednesday, January 11, 2017 1:06 AM
To: Sela, Guy <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>
Cc: Robert Varga <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>; 
[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>;
 odl netvirt dev 
<[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>
Subject: Re: [controller-dev] [mdsal-dev] Netvirt Scale tests: OutOfMemory from 
datastore

operational won't snapshot if not persisted or replicated.

Can you open a bug for tracking?

On Tue, Jan 10, 2017 at 4:12 PM, Sela, Guy 
<[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
Do the snapshot happen only to the configuration data store or to the 
operational as well?

-----Original Message-----
From: Robert Varga [mailto:[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>]
Sent: Tuesday, January 10, 2017 10:21 PM
To: Tom Pantelis <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>; Sela, 
Guy <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>
Cc: 
[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>;
 odl netvirt dev 
<[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>
Subject: Re: [controller-dev] [mdsal-dev] Netvirt Scale tests: OutOfMemory from 
datastore

On 01/10/2017 08:16 PM, Tom Pantelis wrote:
> Since the length field of an array is an int, it's constrained to
> Integer.MAX_VALUE (~2G). To handle snapshots larger than 2G we'll have
> to chuck it into multiple byte[].

That could get funky on the reassembly side of things. If we go that route, we 
may as well switch to something more friendly, like java.nio.ByteBuffer(), too.

Guy, just out of curiosity: how much duplication is in your data set?

Regards,
Robert

_______________________________________________
controller-dev mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.opendaylight.org/mailman/listinfo/controller-dev

Reply via email to