Axalon Bloodstone wrote:
> On Thu, 16 Dec 1999, Juergen Herrmann wrote:
>
> > Am Don, 16 Dez 1999 schrieb "Lord And Master;:
> > > I have a problem the system is now locking on and off and requires a
> > > hard reboot wich I suspect might be a problem with the new kernel? (it
> > > did not start this till the 2.2.14 was interduced. wich is not realy the
> > > problem after the reboot everytime it locks something else seems to stop
> > > working I am now having to manualy start gnome it just boots me into a
> > > xterm when I log into my acount via kdm
> > >
> > > also apache seg faults contiulusly till I shut it down, other glitchs
> > > are poping up left and right.
> > >
> > > -DarkWlf
> >
> > I had problems with the 2.2.14 kernel too
> >
> > When System Load gets high (for example with two Seti@Home clients running) the
> > system hangs after some minutes of operation.
> >
> > This seems to be a problem with the optimized kernel!
> > Someone told me its is not too good to compile the kernel with gcc above 2.7.2.3
> > becuase the optimizations of gcc-2.95.x, egcs and pgcc could produce "bad code".
>
> Alan tests 2.2.x with gcc-2.95.
>
> > Maybe the kernel should be recompiled without "-O6 mcpu=ix86 ..." and
> > gcc-2.7.2.3!
>
> It's not compiled with -O6,
> -O3 -fomit-frame-pointer -fno-exceptions -fno-rtti -pipe -s -mpentium -mcpu=pentium
>-march=pentium -ffast-math -fexpensive-optimizations
>
> Just like everything else.
Even that's aggressive. I get kernel oopses just running RPM on 2.2.14. Maybe it would
have been wiser to await an official 2.2.14 release?
It is confusing having a patched 2.2.13 called 2.2.14 .
Dara Hazeghi
