-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 lolomin wanted us to know:
>What is the meaning of urpmi if we have to upgrade manually every week >at least one package and by the way find which package we have to >upgrade ( because that's never a simple thing for the "normal user" to This is Cooker. If one is a normal user, one should not be using Cooker. >I'm using apt for redhat for now months and never saw it being so wierd >as urpmi is. The dependancy system always work well, i do not say apt is >totally perfect but it seems a lot improved over urpmi ). Maybe it would When I used apt, I had good results too, but I haven't tried it for a while. I still prefer the way that urpmi works, probably just more familiar. - -- Blue skies... Todd | Get a bigger hammer! | A broken clock is right twice a day. | | http://www.mrball.net | --Steve Saitman | | http://faq.mrball.net | ...I don't even know what it is... | Linux kernel 2.4.19-24mdk 5 users, load average: 0.07, 0.31, 0.25 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.2 (GNU/Linux) Comment: http://www.mrball.net/todd.asc iD8DBQE/JznZIBT1264ScBURAu+kAJ96KvvJjWZG0Za1boMSg4koLAvX/gCgsebd 4IITZT4lrDr2vPnhiXml4B8= =G5Qk -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
