Buchan Milne <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > FACORAT Fabrice wrote: > > > Maybe Juan is working on a better version ? > > There is no better version. > > > In fact I don't know ( and Juan silence concerning this is disturbing ), > > but what I know is that we need a reliable and fully functionnal > > supermount, > > That is what supermount-ng is. > > > or else we should better remove it and use autofs. > > Autofs has worse problems for removable media IMHO. > > Please, try a kernel with supermount-ng first, you will see it works > much better.
I updated bug 2846 to reflects this need to supermount-ng = Andrej supermount modified version more clearly. François.
