David Walser <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > David Walser wrote: > > Pixel wrote: > >> David Walser <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > >> > >>> Given that, it seems to me the best thing for services > >>> we don't want enabled by default on installation, is > >>> to just have them not run _post_service in the SPEC > >>> file. They'll get chkconfig --add run when they're > >>> enabled, and they don't lose the list of runlevels > >>> they should be run in. > >> > >> agreed (i don't see any pb doing so, except having rpmlint whining, > >> but that's ok :) > >> > >> for example, packages that don't a working default config file should > >> do this.. > > > > Great :D. Luckily most of the packages I once thought shouldn't start by default > > have either been improved, or I'm just only now smart enough to realize they're OK > > :o). The only one that's still questionable in my eyes is ypbind. > > > > For now, the only packages I know that did the "-" thing in their initscript are > > apcupsd, nscd, and routed, so those need to be fixed. Do you know of any others? > > Actually last we discussed this ypserv also did the "-" thing so if that's still the > case it should be fixed also. The fact that it did that makes the case for doing it > in ypbind stronger too.
AFAIK ypserv isn't doing the - thing. Where do you see this ? -- Fred - May the source be with you