Chmouel Boudjnah wrote: > > Bryan Paxton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > Why is mandrake going to a cvs snapshot of gcc ? > > You would think of all the much about redhat doing so, you'd think more than > > twice about a move like this. > > And even statement(I'd more likely call it an advisory) from the gcc team ? > > If you notice we have the flag and not [CHRPM] and not [FROZEN-CHRPM] > that mean it for cooker not for frozen install. I hope that the current gcc-2.95.2-mdk will still be kept around as compat-gcc or similar... -- - Antony Suter ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) "Examiner" openpgp:71ADFC87 - "And how do you store the nuclear equivalent of the universal solvent?"
- Re: [Cooker] [CHRPM] gcc-2.... Ron Stodden
- Re: [Cooker] [CHRPM] gcc-2.... Thomas M. Beaudry
- Re: [Cooker] Re: [CHRPM] gcc-2.96-0.7mdk Chmouel Boudjnah
- Re: [Cooker] Re: [CHRPM] gcc-2.96-0.... Yoann Vandoorselaere
- Re: [Cooker] Re: [CHRPM] gcc-2.96-0.7mdk Pixel
- Re: [Cooker] gcc-2.96-0.7mdk (note on optimi... Tim McKenzie
- Re: [Cooker] Re: [CHRPM] gcc-2.96-0.7mdk Jason Straight
- Re: [Cooker] Re: [CHRPM] gcc-2.96-0.7mdk Pixel
- Re: [Cooker] Re: [CHRPM] gcc-2.96-0.... Jason Straight
- Re: [Cooker] Re: [CHRPM] gcc-2.96-0.7mdk Chmouel Boudjnah
- [Cooker] gcc 2.96 Antony Suter
- [Cooker] gcc 2.96 Tim McKenzie
- Re: [Cooker] gcc 2.96 Pixel
- Re: [Cooker] gcc 2.96 John Cavan
- Re: [Cooker] gcc 2.96 Chmouel Boudjnah
- Re: [Cooker] gcc 2.96 Francis Galiegue
- Re: [Cooker] gcc 2.96 Chmouel Boudjnah
- Re: [Cooker] gcc 2.96 Thierry Vignaud
- Re: [Cooker] gcc 2.96 Thierry Vignaud
- Re: [Cooker] gcc 2.96 Chmouel Boudjnah
- Re: [Cooker] gcc 2.96 Fernando Monera