Re: [Cooker] gcc 2.96

[John Cavan]

Pixel wrote:
> 
> Tim McKenzie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> 
> > I've read about 2.96 and after
> > experimenting with it I'm dead set against it.
> 
> seems like redhat managed to build their full distro with it, so C++ is not dead
> broke.

Yep, everything except the most important part: the kernel.

John