Jason Straight <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > At this point though isn't cooker basically 7.2? how are we supposed to be 7.2 is gold (or nearly) now. So cooker will now receive more updates and will be less stable...
- Re: [Cooker] Re: [CHRPM] gcc-2.... Vincent Danen
- Re: [Cooker] [CHRPM] gcc-2.... Digital Wokan
- Re: [Cooker] [CHRPM] gcc-2.... Ron Stodden
- Re: [Cooker] [CHRPM] gcc-2.... Ron Stodden
- Re: [Cooker] [CHRPM] gcc-2.... Thomas M. Beaudry
- Re: [Cooker] Re: [CHRPM] gcc-2.96-0.7mdk Chmouel Boudjnah
- Re: [Cooker] Re: [CHRPM] gcc-2.96-0.... Yoann Vandoorselaere
- Re: [Cooker] Re: [CHRPM] gcc-2.96-0.7mdk Pixel
- Re: [Cooker] gcc-2.96-0.7mdk (note on optimi... Tim McKenzie
- Re: [Cooker] Re: [CHRPM] gcc-2.96-0.7mdk Jason Straight
- Re: [Cooker] Re: [CHRPM] gcc-2.96-0.7mdk Pixel
- Re: [Cooker] Re: [CHRPM] gcc-2.96-0.... Jason Straight
- Re: [Cooker] Re: [CHRPM] gcc-2.96-0.7mdk Chmouel Boudjnah
- Re: [Cooker] Re: [CHRPM] gcc-2.96-0.7mdk Antony Suter
- [Cooker] gcc 2.96 Tim McKenzie
- Re: [Cooker] gcc 2.96 Pixel
- Re: [Cooker] gcc 2.96 John Cavan
- Re: [Cooker] gcc 2.96 Chmouel Boudjnah
- Re: [Cooker] gcc 2.96 Francis Galiegue
- Re: [Cooker] gcc 2.96 Chmouel Boudjnah
- Re: [Cooker] gcc 2.96 Thierry Vignaud