OS <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Rather than ranting about this, has anybody actually tried gcc-2.96. We were on At first tries, we succedeed to rebuild these C++ based packages: . qt . kde2 . xwc . doxygen . grany . kisocd . tuxkart . smpeg We failed: . gtkmm . ClanLib . icewm . nist According to Titi, 2.96 respects closer c++ standard. So most apps which will fail are because of lack of c++ standard. Most failures are because of includes in the wrong order, or previous warnings that are now errors. -- Guillaume Cottenceau -- Distribution Developer for MandrakeSoft http://us.mandrakesoft.com/~gc/
- [Cooker] The gcc-2.96 stupidity! Mattias Eriksson
- Re: [Cooker] The gcc-2.96 stupidity! Thierry Vignaud
- Re: [Cooker] The gcc-2.96 stupidity! Mattias Eriksson
- Re: [Cooker] The gcc-2.96 stupidity! Pixel
- Re: [Cooker] The gcc-2.96 stupidity! Mattias Eriksson
- Re: [Cooker] The gcc-2.96 stupidity! Guillaume Cottenceau
- [Cooker] gcc-2.96 and libstdc++ OS
- Re: [Cooker] gcc-2.96 and libst... Alexander Skwar
- Re: [Cooker] gcc-2.96 and libst... Guillaume Cottenceau
- Re: [Cooker] gcc-2.96 and l... Dmitry V. Levin
- Re: [Cooker] gcc-2.96 a... Chmouel Boudjnah
- Re: [Cooker] The gcc-2.96 stupidity! Thierry Vignaud
- Re: [Cooker] The gcc-2.96 stupidity! Jason Straight
- Re: [Cooker] The gcc-2.96 stupidity! Mattias Eriksson
- Re: [Cooker] The gcc-2.96 stupidity! Graham Percival
- Re: [Cooker] The gcc-2.96 stupidity! Guillaume Cottenceau
- Re: [Cooker] The gcc-2.96 stupi... Alexander Skwar
- Re: [Cooker] The gcc-2.96 s... Guillaume Cottenceau
- Re: [Cooker] The gcc-2.... David Walluck