Re: [Cooker] Why gcc 2.96 and not 3.0?

[Geoffrey Lee]

> I'm not worrying. It's just that for LM 8.1, it would be nice to have
> gcc 3.0...
> And to have the c++ compatibilities libs (there was a link to a missing
> library in the 8.0 when it was first distributed. Don't know if it was
> fixed, we're using 7.2 for our work, and I didn't try with the 8.0 since
> that time) with gcc 2.95.x, so that you could upgrade your system without
> needing to recompile everything.


Should a new compiler be used compat libs will definitely be around for a
while for old programs. Don't worry. :-)


-- 
Geoffrey Lee <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
李長風

http://www.wychk.org/~glee

$ /usr/games/fortune
Anything that can go wrong will go
Segmentation fault (core dumped)
$