Re: [Cooker] Why gcc 2.96 and not 3.0?

[Guillaume Cottenceau]

Xavier Bertou <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:

> On Fri, Jul 20, 2001 at 09:19:10PM +1000, Geoffrey Lee wrote:
> > egcs is not compatible with gcc 2.95.x. gcc 2.95.x is not compile with
> > gcc 2.96. gcc 2.96 is not compatible with gcc 3.0.
> > 
> > End of story. We have distributed egcs  and gcc 2.95 before, we had 
> > incompatibility, why are you worrying so much?
> 
> I'm not worrying. It's just that for LM 8.1, it would be nice to have
> gcc 3.0...

Apparently, it's not sure at all that we'll ship 8.1 (sept/oct) with
default compiler set as gcc-3.0, considering the current status/stability
of the compiler.



-- 
Guillaume Cottenceau - http://people.mandrakesoft.com/~gc/