Yves Duret wrote:
> David Walluck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
>
>
>>It looks like libavifile without the codecs whould be perfectly legal. I know
>>I was dicussing this earlier. I have SRPMS of the latest CVS version of
>>libavifile, but I don't want to release until I am also sure about the
>>legality of the whole thing. However, sourceforge hosts these sometimes and
>>they are located in the US. If Guillaume would like my spec in order to update
>>
>
> But, where is the interest to have a package non fonctionnal ???
> definitly, since there is no change in license, we won't include those kind of rpms.
>
>
No, it can at least play avi's without these codecs. Besides, the codecs
are legal if you have Windows installed. Most users will just have to
copy them to /usr/lib/win32 (a lot of users dual boot Windows and
Mandrake, as I'm sure you know).
--
Sincerely,
David Walluck
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
