> > borsenkow> Not mentioning that CVS has no entries for new kernels. If they > are > borsenkow> built from some private repository, PLEASE, move them to contrib. > > Fixed in 2.4.16.4mdk >
What? CVS or contribs? > - Cooker has an old kernel that has _all_ the features and a new > kernel soon that is catching up. > > I think that the 3rd option is a clear winner, if your opinion differ, > I will like to hear. > Nothing wrong except - it does not belong into RPMS as I have already said. Please, make separate directory under cooker, name it kernel-test or how you like and place them all there. I repeat - these kernels do not belong to distribution, because - our (your) own tools like urpmi do not know what to do with them; you'd have to at least add all of them into inst.list or add support for wildcards - each such kernel + all sources + all docs add up 100MB. You may have these - some people do not. Besides, why build HTML + PDF + ... docs for experimental kernel? All docs are available in kernel-source package. I have nothing against providing them; I oppose to providing them as part of main distro. -andrej
