So sprach »Yves Duret« am 2001-12-05 um 15:00:24 +0100 : > patches from everywhere without the risk of breaking cooker. if the new one is > stable enough, the older goes away and so on...
Hm, if that's the goal, what about having: Name: kernel Version: <something-which-is-stable> Release: 1mdk (or whatever) and for the experimental kernel: Name: kernel-test Version: 2.4.16 (or whatever) Release: 1mdk (or whatever) Provides: kernel-2.4.16-1mdk This would allow the kernel hackers to experiment with a kernel, while still having a known good kernel around. Also, this would not change the name of the package every time. Wouldn't this be sufficient? Because I don't see the need to have n test kernels flying around. With my proposal, there would be only one test kernel. Alexander Skwar -- >> Wohnung in Gelsenkirchen und Umgebung gesucht! << iso-top.de - Die günstige Art an Linux Distributionen zu kommen Uptime: 22 hours 24 minutes