> > > Really, what's gained by changing the *name* of the package each time? > > to have two or more kernel 2.4 in cooker > for example a stable one, and an another one whwere juan&chmou can apply > patches from everywhere without the risk of breaking cooker. if the new one > is > stable enough, the older goes away and so on... > You now could be sure to reboot your station after a kernel/cooker upgrade..
If it is unstable version and not built off official SPECS then by all means, PLEASE, MOVE IT INTO CONTRIBS! And call it normally. -andrej
