-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Stephen Pickering wrote:
| ustin Acton wrote:
|
|> We could stop a LOT of the complaining by adding one simple feature...
|> In the RPM installer, add an icon that opens the package remover; in the
|> remover, add an icon that opens the installer.
|>
| Better still revert to the old style installer and add switches to
| enable restricted views and
| add appropriate menu calls, eg:

Why were (are?) rpmdrake and MandrakeUpdate separate applications? You
could simply have them be 2 tabs on one interface. This would simplify
things a lot. The name of the application (as invoked as 'rpmdrake'
would simply set the tab to tab 2, and 'MandrakeUpdate' to tab 1, which
is similar to how it's done already, except that they look too  much
like differnt applications when they are really one in the same).

This would make the interface less confusing to newbies IMO (it is even
confusing to me, and I have been using RPMS for years and years).

Also, I can't seem to easily define urpmi sources in MandrakeUpdate like
I used to, so I've resorted back to using the command line.

Since I didn't really notice anything wrong with MandrakeUpdate in the
first place, I personally can't say that the new one is worse or better,
but I wish the interface was more like that of kpackage (or even gnorpm
(same difference)).

- --
Sincerely,

David Walluck
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.7 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iD8DBQE9nbkPJB7s/tlHKVIRAhqTAJ0XE00UjcH8PhtHRsyD4n14nkXzmgCgh5g0
2763W5hLuVW79TIRtS31Ynw=
=BTHq
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----


Reply via email to