On Wed, 2002-10-09 at 07:40, Guillaume Cottenceau wrote: > rowland penny <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > mandrake is advertised as being i586 (or pentium) compatible not i686 > > (celeron, p2,p3,p4) so why have a directory named i686?. redhat 8.0 loads > > to optimize better for i686 and superior processors, what else? > it's not incompatible with being i586 compatible, or explain me > your reasoning.
Short sweet and to the point thanks Guillaume James > > > -- > Guillaume Cottenceau - http://people.mandrakesoft.com/~gc/ >