On Wed, 2002-10-09 at 07:40, Guillaume Cottenceau wrote:
> rowland penny <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> 
> > mandrake is advertised as being i586 (or pentium) compatible not i686 
> > (celeron, p2,p3,p4) so why have a directory named i686?. redhat 8.0 loads 
> 
> to optimize better for i686 and superior processors, what else?
> it's not incompatible with being i586 compatible, or explain me
> your reasoning.

Short sweet and to the point thanks Guillaume

James

> 
> 
> -- 
> Guillaume Cottenceau - http://people.mandrakesoft.com/~gc/
> 



Reply via email to