onsdagen den 20 november 2002 10.54 skrev Guy.Bormann: > [snip] > > > > > Because I do not trust tinydns to do the job. I know a guy that has > > > > been > > > > working several years with the dot se top domain..., and I do take > > > > his word > > > > for it... > > > > > > Ok... you don't trust tinydns to do the job. Fair enough. Can I ask > > > why? > > > > I had the whole icq chat in my history file that was lost after a session > > with ez-drive ;) So..., I can't remember specifically where the problems > > lies. I can ask him again if you like? > > Mmm, Oden, that's double standards when you compare to ... this: > > [snip] > > > As I'm not in the position to tell if bind does the job worse than > > whatever else name server software I can't really say. I do have to trust > > that the de facto standard name server software works. If it didn't work > > you would surely be notified from a bunch of angry customers. Switching > > to djbdns is not an option for me in the near future I'm afraid.
Well..., I meant that to _know_ what you talking about you have to present facts and tests in some form. I cannot present this because I don't know the rfc:s by heart, I am no programmer, I do not have the skills to do the tests neither do I have the suitable lab environment. Again, I do trust the words of a guy that have been working many years at the SE top domain that "tinydns" (part of djbdns by DJB) does not do the job properly. I you can provide facts and tests that says otherwise, please do not hesitate to enlighten me. -- Regards // Oden Eriksson, Deserve-IT Networks Check the "Modules For Apache2" status page at: http://www.deserve-it.com/modules_for_apache2.html
