Le 20/05/2010 13:25, Dmytro Sheyko a écrit :
Hi Remi,

I believe that it is up to javac to generate compact and interpretation-efficient bytecode.

No, javac is dumb, at least, when it translates instructions. And JITs love that.

But anyway the first case seems to as acceptable as the second one. So I don't care which style is used (of course, if it's consistent).

Thanks,
Dmytro Sheyko

Rémi

Reply via email to