On Mon, 15 Feb 2021 20:34:53 GMT, Claes Redestad <redes...@openjdk.org> wrote:
> > Is there a reason `sun.nio.cs.ISO_8859_1.Encoder#implEncodeISOArray(char[], > > int, byte[], int, int)` wasn't moved to `JavaLangAccess` as well? > > Exposing StringUTF16.compress for Latin-1 and ASCII-compatible encoders seem > very reasonable, which I was thinking of exploring next as a separate RFE. Maybe I misunderstood. The intrinsified method you point out here pre-dates the work in JDK 9 to similarly intrinsify char[]->byte[] compaction in StringUTF16, see https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-6896617 It might be worthwhile cleaning this up. Not having to route via SharedSecrets -> JavaLangAccess does speed things up during startup/interpretation, at the cost of some code duplication. ------------- PR: https://git.openjdk.java.net/jdk/pull/2574
