For the third time: This discussion illustrates why the PR was
premature; the design was not agreed upon first. High-level design
discussions (i.e., "is this a good design", "is this a good idea at
all", "are we solving the right problem", "does it need to be solved in
the JDK") should happen first on the discussion lists; if they happen on
a PR like this, that's clear evidence that important steps have been
skipped.
On 8/14/2021 10:48 PM, CC007 wrote:
On Mon, 9 Aug 2021 12:28:23 GMT, CC007 <github.com+5381337+cc...@openjdk.org>
wrote:
create Streamable and ParallelStreamable interface and use them in Collection
and Optional
I read through [these
posts](http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/lambda-libs-spec-experts/2013-June/thread.html#1910)
and while I did see good reasons for not moving stream to Iterable, I didn't see any
mention of a separate Streamable-like interface, so could you elaborate on that it
"did not carry its weight"?
-------------
PR: https://git.openjdk.java.net/jdk/pull/5050
