On Fri, 3 Sep 2021 09:10:20 GMT, Aleksey Shipilev <sh...@openjdk.org> wrote:
> During the review of JDK-8272914 that added hotspot:tier{2,3} groups,
> @iignatev suggested to create tier4 groups that capture all tests not in
> tiers{1,2,3}. I have excluded `vmTestbase` and `hotspot:tier4,` because they
> take 10+ hours on my highly parallel machine. I have also excluded
> `applications` from `hotspot:tier4`, because they require test dependencies
> (e.g. jcstress).
>
> Sample run:
>
>
> ==============================
> Test summary
> ==============================
> TEST TOTAL PASS FAIL ERROR
>
>>> jtreg:test/hotspot/jtreg:tier4 426 425 1 0 <<
>>> jtreg:test/jdk:tier4 2891 2885 4 2 <<
> jtreg:test/langtools:tier4 0 0 0 0
>
> jtreg:test/jaxp:tier4 0 0 0 0
>
> ==============================
>
> real 64m13.994s
> user 1462m1.213s
> sys 39m38.032s
>
>
> There are interesting test failures on my machine, which I would address
> separately.
> <...> I have excluded `vmTestbase` and `hotspot:tier4`<...> I have also
> excluded `applications` from `hotspot:tier4` <...>
assuming the goal of tier4 is to catch the rest of the tests, I don't think we
should exclude `vmTestbase`, `applications` or any other tests from tier4.
unless you also want to create tier5 for them.
-- Igor
-------------
PR: https://git.openjdk.java.net/jdk/pull/5357
