On Sat, 4 Sep 2021 02:51:50 GMT, Sergey Bylokhov <s...@openjdk.org> wrote:
>> During the review of JDK-8272914 that added hotspot:tier{2,3} groups,
>> @iignatev suggested to create tier4 groups that capture all tests not in
>> tiers{1,2,3}. I have excluded `vmTestbase` and `hotspot:tier4,` because they
>> take 10+ hours on my highly parallel machine. I have also excluded
>> `applications` from `hotspot:tier4`, because they require test dependencies
>> (e.g. jcstress).
>>
>> Sample run:
>>
>>
>> ==============================
>> Test summary
>> ==============================
>> TEST TOTAL PASS FAIL ERROR
>>
>>>> jtreg:test/hotspot/jtreg:tier4 426 425 1 0
>>>> <<
>>>> jtreg:test/jdk:tier4 2891 2885 4 2
>>>> <<
>> jtreg:test/langtools:tier4 0 0 0 0
>>
>> jtreg:test/jaxp:tier4 0 0 0 0
>>
>> ==============================
>>
>> real 64m13.994s
>> user 1462m1.213s
>> sys 39m38.032s
>>
>>
>> There are interesting test failures on my machine, which I would address
>> separately.
>
> it looks like the results above do not include the headful tests did you
> filter them out?
>>> jtreg:test/jdk:tier4 2891 2885 4 2 <<
> @mrserb: Yes, I ran this on a headless config, so headful tests were skipped,
> apparently. I'll try to arrange runs on my desktop.
Then you probably need to skip "printer" tests as well. BTW it will be really
good somehow to execute headless tests in tier4 concurrently, and run the
headful tests in tier5 sequentially.
-------------
PR: https://git.openjdk.java.net/jdk/pull/5357
