On Thu, 16 Dec 2021 21:22:02 GMT, Paul Sandoz <psan...@openjdk.org> wrote:

> > "embarrassingly parallel when employing recursive" -> "embarrassingly 
> > non-parallel when employing recursive" (?)
> 
> I corrected to "embarrassingly parallelizable" (i believe that is a common 
> phrase we as software engineers use in these cases).

Makes more sense that way. Should we add something about it not being 
computationally worthwhile doing for the Karatsuba calculation, which is even 
easier to parallelize, but which has a lower threshold and thus does not give 
performance advantages?

-------------

PR: https://git.openjdk.java.net/jdk/pull/6409

Reply via email to