On Fri, 14 Jan 2022 09:15:37 GMT, kabutz <d...@openjdk.java.net> wrote:
>>> > embarrassingly parallelizable >>> >>> Having looked at [embarrassingly >>> parallel](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Embarrassingly_parallel), I'm not >>> certain that this particular problem would qualify. The algorithm is easy >>> to parallelize, but in the end we still have some rather large numbers, so >>> memory will be our primary dominator. I'd expect to see a linear speedup if >>> it was "perfectly parallel", but this does not come close to that. >> >> Ok, fair point, to avoid possible confusion I have removed "embarrassingly". >> I don't think we need to refer to other algorithms. > > Hi @PaulSandoz is there anything else that we need to do? Or is this in the > hopper for Java 19 already? @kabutz i just finalized the CSR (the new year break meant all this is taking longer than usual). Based on that review we may need to make some tweaks to the API doc, which should be quick to process. So it should be in the bag for 19. ------------- PR: https://git.openjdk.java.net/jdk/pull/6409
